Forest Line 1
1
/
total
We observe two cities within the city; a north city and a south city. The south city is defined by a triangular logic between three major vertices; the administrative district based around the Presidential Office, the financial district on the opposing end symbolized by the Taipei 101, and an educational district built upon the National Taiwan University campus. The north city is defined by more recent urban regeneration operations that speak of a modern Taipei of hi-tech cultural districts and is loosely defined by the logic of the Keelung River. The remainder city between the north and south cities has a more diffuse identity and tenuous logic. The site is located at the axis of this north-south divide.
Imagine a green infrastructure that allows a new way to navigate the city. An enabling infrastructure that provides an alternative to car-based urban reality, emancipating the elderly, expanding the imagination of the young and with the capacity to empower other dependent and marginalized social groups.
The Taipei Turntable proposes an ever-recurrent circular narrative between the administrative, financial and educational districts of the southern city and the modern cultural and hi-tech districts of the northern city. This site’s location, orientation and size give it instrumental strategic value abolishing the north-south divide.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
心中山 捷運中山雙連線型公園
一座可穿越的城市請想像一條綠廊能夠提供重新體驗探索城市的可能性，這條綠色基礎設施讓原本以車行為主的城市重新釋放公共空間讓居住其中的長輩漫步、擴展年輕人對於城市生活的嚮往、賦權予不同需求的各色社群的城市日常。Professor Kenneth Frampton倡議「以地景形式元素作為手段」來回應「碎化的都市主義」，都市設計的策略有機會使我們重新回歸討論公共場域的空間品質，並且提出跨越疆界洲際來實踐觀都市主義的宣言。臺北捷運公司(TRTC)擁有管控捷運沿線的開放空間的權責，「心中山線形公園」這條帶狀的基地的潛在觸及力，不僅在空間上、概念上更遠甚此案劃定的基地範圍線，臺北捷運公司對於城市開放空間發展策略必須主動掌控。於此我們一開始就不將心中山限縮於連結中山與雙連捷運站之間的開放空間廊帶來回應設計需求，而是將本案視作對於未來都市再生蘊藏龐大改造潛能的行動計畫起手式。
一座可穿越的城市請想像一條綠廊能夠提供重新體驗探索城市的可能性，這條綠色基礎設施讓原本以車行為主的城市重新釋放公共空間讓居住其中的長輩漫步、擴展年輕人對於城市生活的嚮往、賦權予不同需求的各色社群的城市日常。Professor Kenneth Frampton倡議「以地景形式元素作為手段」來回應「碎化的都市主義」，都市設計的策略有機會使我們重新回歸討論公共場域的空間品質，並且提出跨越疆界洲際來實踐觀都市主義的宣言。臺北捷運公司(TRTC)擁有管控捷運沿線的開放空間的權責，「心中山線形公園」這條帶狀的基地的潛在觸及力，不僅在空間上、概念上更遠甚此案劃定的基地範圍線，臺北捷運公司對於城市開放空間發展策略必須主動掌控。於此我們一開始就不將心中山限縮於連結中山與雙連捷運站之間的開放空間廊帶來回應設計需求，而是將本案視作對於未來都市再生蘊藏龐大改造潛能的行動計畫起手式。